朱宜生,王超,陈中青.舰船设备振动试验方法的探讨[J].装备环境工程,2016,13(1):112-115. ZHU Yi-sheng,WANG Chao,CHEN Zhong-qing.Discussion on Vibration Test Methods for Shipborne Equipment[J].Equipment Environmental Engineering,2016,13(1):112-115.
舰船设备振动试验方法的探讨
Discussion on Vibration Test Methods for Shipborne Equipment
投稿时间:2015-09-03  修订日期:2016-02-15
DOI:10.7643/issn.1672-9242.2016.01.021
中文关键词:  舰船设备  振动试验  暴露量级
英文关键词:shipborne equipment  vibration test  exposure order
基金项目:
作者单位
朱宜生 1. 中国船舶重工集团第七二三研究所,江苏 扬州 225001;2. 中国船舶工业电工电设备环境与可靠性试验检测中心,江苏 扬州 225001 
王超 1. 中国船舶重工集团第七二三研究所,江苏 扬州 225001;2. 中国船舶工业电工电设备环境与可靠性试验检测中心,江苏 扬州 225001 
陈中青 1. 中国船舶重工集团第七二三研究所,江苏 扬州 225001;2. 中国船舶工业电工电设备环境与可靠性试验检测中心,江苏 扬州 225001 
AuthorInstitution
ZHU Yi-sheng 1. The 723 Institute of CSIC, Yangzhou 225001, China; 2. China Shipbuilding Industry Environment and Reliability Test Centre for Electric and Electronic Equipment, Yangzhou 225001, China 
WANG Chao 1. The 723 Institute of CSIC, Yangzhou 225001, China; 2. China Shipbuilding Industry Environment and Reliability Test Centre for Electric and Electronic Equipment, Yangzhou 225001, China 
CHEN Zhong-qing 1. The 723 Institute of CSIC, Yangzhou 225001, China; 2. China Shipbuilding Industry Environment and Reliability Test Centre for Electric and Electronic Equipment, Yangzhou 225001, China 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨舰船设备振动试验中的几个问题并提出解决方法。方法 分析GJB 150.16A, GJB4.7—83和MIL-STD-167-1A等振动试验标准, 找出其中存在的缺点。阐述实验室模拟与实际环境的差异, 提出改进建议。结果 GJB 150.16A中没有明确说明随机部分和正弦部分是单独试验还是叠加试验, GJB 4.7—83 和MIL-STD-167-1A中没有给出随机振动的条件, 只有正弦振动部分。结论对于标准中存在的缺点, 在每个轴向, 首先进行一半的功能试验, 再进行随机叠加正弦/随机振动, 最后进行另一半功能试验。对于实验室模拟与实际环境存在差异的问题, 通过采用力谱控制、 采用模拟舰船结构的夹具、 规定安装方式、 对环境条件进行反复迭代等方法改进。
英文摘要:
      Objective To discuss some problems in the vibration test of ship equipment and put forward the corresponding solutions. Methods The vibration test standards GJB 150.16A, GJB 4.7—83 and MIL-STD-167-1A were analyzed, finding out the shortcomings. The difference between the laboratory simulation and the real environment was expounded, and the improvement suggestions were put forward. Results It was not clearly described that the random part and the since part was a separate test or overlay test in GJB 150.16A, while GJB 4.7—83 and MIL-STD-167-1A only gave the since vibration part, not giving the condition of random vibration. Conclusion For the shortcomings of the standards, first half times of the function test for each axes were carried out, and then random superposition of since/ random vibration test was carried out, and finally the residual function test was carried out. For the difference between the laboratory simulation and the real environment, the improvement was achieved through using force spectrum control, test fixture for simulating ship′ s structure, prescribing the provisions of the installation and repeated iterative of environmental conditions and other methods.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护 | 用户协议

您是第11975879位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-5

版权所有:《装备环境工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

邮编:400039     电话:023-68792835    Email: zbhjgc@163.com

视频号 公众号