李旭,雷金果,张永亮.不同工况下飞机液冷车制冷换热系统PID控制的建模与仿真[J].装备环境工程,2017,14(9):1-5. LI Xu,LEI Jin-guo,ZHANG Yong-liang.Modeling and Simulation of PID Control for Refrigeration Heat Exchange System of Aircraft Liquid-cooling Carts in Different Working Conditions[J].Equipment Environmental Engineering,2017,14(9):1-5.
不同工况下飞机液冷车制冷换热系统PID控制的建模与仿真
Modeling and Simulation of PID Control for Refrigeration Heat Exchange System of Aircraft Liquid-cooling Carts in Different Working Conditions
投稿时间:2017-06-12  修订日期:2017-09-15
DOI:10.7643/ issn.1672-9242.2017.09.001
中文关键词:  飞机液冷车  制冷换热系统  数学模型  PID控制  仿真
英文关键词:aircraft liquid cooling cart  refrigeration heat exchange system  mathematical model  PID control  simulation
基金项目:江苏省自然科学基金(SBK2015020623)
作者单位
李旭 空军勤务学院 航空四站系,江苏 徐州 221000 
雷金果 空军勤务学院 航空四站系,江苏 徐州 221000 
张永亮 空军勤务学院 航空四站系,江苏 徐州 221000 
AuthorInstitution
LI Xu Department of Aviation Ground, Air force Logistics College, Jiangsu 221000, China 
LEI Jin-guo Department of Aviation Ground, Air force Logistics College, Jiangsu 221000, China 
ZHANG Yong-liang Department of Aviation Ground, Air force Logistics College, Jiangsu 221000, China 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 解决现有研究只考虑单一制冷工况,导致数学模型建立不精确,对飞机液冷车控制系统PID控制效果产生较为不利影响这一问题,提高控制系统的控制能力。方法 根据飞机的保障需求和飞机液冷车的具体工况,分别建立制冷和制热两种工况下制冷换热系统的数学模型,并利用Simulink进行仿真研究。结果 与单一制冷工况下所建立的数学模型相比,两种工况下所建立的数学模型其PID控制在制冷、制热工况下响应时间分别为2.1,3.1 min,短于单一制冷工况下所建立的数学模型(2.8,4.5 min)。系统误差分别为0.75%,0.51%,低于单一制冷工况(1.5%,0.71%)。结论 在两种工况数学模型下的PID控制在响应速度、控制精度等方面均显示出更好的控制能力,具有良好的军事和工业应用前景。
英文摘要:
      The present studies usually just consider one working condition to build mathematical model, which makes the model inaccurate and makes the PID control of the control system have adverse control effects. To solve the problem and enhance the control ability of the system, two different mathematic models of the refrigeration heat exchange system in refrigeration and heating working conditions were built according to the needs of the aircrafts and the working condition of the aircraft liquid-cooling carts. And a simulation research was carried out based on Simulink. Compared to the mathematical model in single refrigeration working condition, the response time of the PID control in the models in the two conditions was 2.1 min and 3.1 min respectively, which was shorter than that of the PID control in the model of single refrigeration-2.8 min, 4.5 min. And the errors of the control system were 0.75%, 0.51%, which were shorter than the errors of the PID control in the model in single refrigeration-1.5%, 0.71%. The models in the two conditions have a better PID control ability in response speed, control accuracy, and have a good prospect for industrial and military applications.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护 | 用户协议

您是第11984875位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-5

版权所有:《装备环境工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

邮编:400039     电话:023-68792835    Email: zbhjgc@163.com

视频号 公众号