目的 系统评价装备气候环境试验数字化技术的实施效能与应用价值,构建一套多维度、层次化、可量化的数字化技术成熟度评价方法。方法 聚焦装备气候环境试验数字化进程,识别并定义装备气候环境试验数字化技术成熟度分级标准,构建多层级的数字化技术成熟度评价指标体系。在此基础上,提出一种融合试验方案数字化、软硬件系统数字化与管理平台数字化的三级评价维度量化评价方法,通过专家打分与层次分析法确定各指标权重,并制定具有可操作性的评价准则。结果 基于典型装备气候环境试验数据开展实证研究,结果表明,该方法能够有效反映数字化水平的阶段性特征,具备良好的区分度与实用性。结论 本研究填补了装备气候环境试验数字化领域系统性评价标准的空白,为推动试验智能化转型提供了可复制、可推广的评价范式。
Abstract
The work aims to establish a multi-dimensional, hierarchical, and quantifiable evaluation method for digital technology maturity to systematically evaluate the implementation effectiveness and application value of digital technologies in equipment climate environment testing. Focusing on the digital transformation process of equipment climate environment testing, a graded standard for digital technology maturity was identified and defined, and a multi-level evaluation indicator system was constructed. On this basis, a quantitative evaluation method was proposed, integrating three hierarchical dimensions, digitalization of test protocols, digitalization of software and hardware systemsand digitalization of management platforms. Expert scoring and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) were employed to determine the weight coefficients of each indicator, along with the formulation of actionable evaluation criteria. Empirical research based on real-world climate environment test data from typical equipment demonstrated that the proposed method effectively captured the phased characteristics of digitalization levels, exhibiting strong discriminative power and practical applicability. This study fills the gap in systematic evaluation standards for digital transformation in equipment climate environment testing and provides a replicable and scalable evaluation paradigm to promote the intelligent transition of testing processes.
关键词
成熟度 /
气候环境试验 /
数字化技术 /
成熟度分级标准 /
评价指标体系
Key words
maturity /
climate environment testing /
digital technology /
graded standard of maturity /
evaluation indicator system
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 郑茂林. 基于成熟度模型的数字交通网络安全评价指标体系和评价方法研究[J]. 电脑知识与技术, 2025, 21(16): 91-94.
ZHENG M L.Research on Security Evaluation Index System and Evaluation Method of Digital Transportation Network Based on Maturity Model[J]. Computer Knowledge and Technology, 2025, 21(16): 91-94.
[2] 马瑞鑫, 吴静媛, 葛乃铭. 数字孪生航道技术及成熟度等级评价模型研究[J]. 水运工程, 2024(9): 209-216.
MA R X, WU J Y, GE N M.Technology and Maturity Level Evaluation Model of Digital Twin Waterway[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2024(9): 209-216.
[3] 李超, 王子龙, 冯维玺. 企业数字化能力成熟度评价模型构建研究[J]. 中小企业管理与科技, 2025(20): 110-115.
LI C, WANG Z L, FENG W X.Research on the Construction of Evaluation Model of Enterprise Digitalization Capability Maturity[J]. Management & Technology of SME, 2025(20): 110-115.
[4] 王婷婷. 建筑企业数字化成熟度评价模型研究[J]. 价值工程, 2025, 44(33): 46-50.
WANG T T.Research on the Digital Maturity Evaluation Model of Construction Enterprises[J]. Value Engineering, 2025, 44(33): 46-50.
[5] 史旭初, 邓志鹏, 金钱菽. 基于数字孪生技术的内河集装箱港口信息协同系统设计[J]. 水运管理, 2023, 45(5): 5-9.
SHI X C, DENG Z P, JIN Q S.Design of Inland Container Port Information Collaboration System Based on Digital Twinning Technology[J]. Shipping Management, 2023, 45(5): 5-9.
[6] 郭宁生, 蒙涛. 航空领域重大关键技术项目发现影响因素研究[J]. 航空工程进展, 2022, 13(1): 160-167.
GUO N S, MENG T.Research on Influencing Factors of Major Key Technology Project Discovery in Aviation Field[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2022, 13(1): 160-167.
[7] 刘媛, 付功云. 构建建筑企业数字化转型评价体系的探索[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(5): 56-63.
LIU Y, FU G Y.Exploration on Constructing the Evaluation System of Digital Transformation of Construction Enterprises[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42(5): 56-63.
[8] 孙波, 王炜. 航空型号研制项目管理成熟度评价体系构建及方法研究[J]. 项目管理技术, 2025, 23(10): 93-99.
SUN B, WANG W.Research on the Construction and Method of Maturity Evaluation System for Aviation Model Development Project Management[J]. Project Management Technology, 2025, 23(10): 93-99.
[9] 盛浩, 陈光春, 杨超. 基于场景覆盖与技术成熟度的机场人工智能技术应用评价体系研究[J]. 数字化转型, 2026, 3(2): 93-100.
SHENG H, CHEN G C, YANG C.Research on the Evaluation System of Airport Artificial Intelligence Technology Application Based on Scene Coverage and Technological Maturity[J]. Digital Transformation, 2026, 3(2): 93-100.
[10] ZHANG H, QI Q L, TAO F.A Multi-Scale Modeling Method for Digital Twin Shop-Floor[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2022, 62: 417-428.
[11] 谢晓芳, 郭晓茹. 基于云模型的航空公司安全管理体系成熟度评价[J]. 山东航空学院学报, 2024, 41(6): 21-30.
XIE X F, GUO X R.Maturity Evaluation of Airline Safety Management System Based on Cloud Modeling[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Aeronautics, 2024, 41(6): 21-30.
[12] 李达, 王崑声, 马宽. 技术成熟度评价方法综述[J]. 科学决策, 2012(11): 85-94.
LI D, WANG K S, MA K.Review on the Evaluation Method of Technology Maturity[J]. Scientific Decision Making, 2012(11): 85-94.
[13] 李鸿志, 邹树梁, 唐德文, 等. 基于层次模糊综合评价的安全标准化成熟度评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2015, 15(2): 38-42.
LI H Z, ZOU S L, TANG D W, et al.Evaluation Study of the Maturity Indexes for Safety Criteria Based on the Hierarchical Analysis and Comprehensive Fuzzy Processing Method[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2015, 15(2): 38-42.
[14] 罗本成, 胡笳, 王若蒂. 基于灰色熵变权的智慧港口等级评价方法[J]. 交通运输研究, 2023, 9(1): 127-133.
LUO B C, HU J, WANG R D.Evaluation Method of Smart Port Development Based on Gray Entropy Variable Weight[J]. Transport Research, 2023, 9(1): 127-133.
[15] 中国人民解放军总装备部. GJB 7688—2012,装备技术成熟度等级划分及定义[S].北京:国家军用标准-总装备部,2012.
General Armaments Department of the People's Liberation Army. Classification and Definition of Technology Readiness Levels for Equipment: GJB 7688—2012[S]. Beijing: GJB of General Armaments Department, 2012.
[16] 中国人民解放军总装备部. 装备技术成熟度评价程序: GJB 7689—2012[S]. 北京: 国家军用标准-总装备部, 2012.
General Armaments Department of the People's Liberation Army. Evaluation Procedure for Technology Readiness Levels of Equipment: GJB 7689—2012[S]. Beijing: GJB of General Armaments Department, 2012.
[17] 国家市场监督管理总局. 航天工程技术成熟度评价指南: GB/T 40518—2021[S]. 北京: 国家标准化管理委员会, 2021.
State Administration for Market Regulation. GB/T 40518— 2021 Guideline of Technology Readiness Assessment for Aerospace Engineering[S]. Beijing:Standardization Administration of China, 2021.
[18] 吴燕生. 技术成熟度及其评价方法[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2012.
WU Y S.Technology Readiness and Its Assessment Method[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2012.
[1] 邢晨光, 程文渊, 宋刚. 国内外技术成熟度评价相关标准规范对比分析研究[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2020, 34(1): 74-80.
XING C G, CHENG W Y, SONG G.Comparative Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Standards and Specifications for Technology Maturity Evaluation[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2020, 34(1): 74-80.
[1] 魏婕, 黄琼, 罗双虎, 等. 基于多目标优化的核电建造数字化成熟度评价模型[J]. 上海电力大学学报, 2026, 42(1): 47-53.
WEI J, HUANG Q, LUO S H, et al.Digital Maturity Evaluation Model for Nuclear Power Construction Based on Multi-Objective Optimization[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Electric Power, 2026, 42(1): 47-53.
[2] MA R X, YIN Y, CHEN J, et al.Multi-Modal Information Fusion for LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection Framework[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83(3): 7995-8012.
[3] 罗银, 林军. 软件产品成熟度模型与评价研究[J]. 电子产品可靠性与环境试验2024(3): 75-79.
LUO Y, LIN J.Research on Software Product Maturity Model and Evaluation[J]. Electronics Product Reliability and Environmental Testing, 2024(3): 75-79.
[4] 陶飞, 张辰源, 戚庆林, 等. 数字孪生成熟度模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2022, 28(5): 1267-1281.
TAO F, ZHANG C Y, QI Q L, et al.Digital Twin Maturity Model[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2022, 28(5): 1267-1281.
[5] 强群莉, 赵嘉瑞. 基于成熟度模型的芯片项目评价研究[J]. 石家庄学院学报, 2023, 25(6): 40-49.
QIANG Q L, ZHAO J R.Research on Chip Project Evaluation Based on Maturity Model[J]. Journal of Shijiazhuang University, 2023, 25(6): 40-49.
[6] 孟松鹤, 叶雨玫, 杨强, 等. 数字孪生及其在航空航天中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(9): 1-12.
MENG S H, YE Y M, YANG Q, et al.Digital Twin and Its Aerospace Applications[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(9): 1-12.
PDF(2106 KB)
